The cause for this spike is that the People’s Bank of China (the central bank or PBOC) decided not to intervene and stabilise the market. Previously, when Chinese banks required liquidity they had an implicit understanding that the PBOC would print it for them, allowing them to continue with their lending.
However, the PBOC did not act, setting a precedent that banks will need to make prudent decisions.
Market insiders in China have been worried about shadow banking, but the reason shadow banking exists is because businesses do not have access to capital through means they would have through a mature financial system (i.e. the banks). So in essence, shadow bankers are financiers who borrow from the banks and then lend to the people.
This is an additional middleman, as banks are already supposed to be an intermediary, and is thus not efficient.
The spread widens (what the bank charges for interest and what the end user business actually pays) with shadow banking – sometimes precipitously as they price somewhere between debt and equity, and far higher than artificially low rates pre-interest deregulation in China.
- Where is the S&P 500 and Where Will It Be in 6/12/18 Months – Part II
- Leasing and Speciality Finance Companies Part II: Element Fleet Management Case Study
- Leasing and Speciality Finance Companies Part I: An Introduction to Leasing and Lending
- Interview with Sales & Trading Associate in Hong Kong
- Trade Finance and Letters of Credit Overview
- Understanding China and the Investment Thesis
- Emerging Markets We Are Investing In Right Now (for Canadians)
- Insurance – Property & Casualty
- Observations on Chinese Assets and Investing
- Trends in Chinese Technology Stocks